The Hurt Locker (Pre-Oscar review.)
Reviewer: Steve Dollar
Rating (out of 5): ****
If Kathryn Bigelow succeeds in winning an Oscar for best director next Sunday, which many pundits (including this one) anticipate, it will strike a revolutionary blow in the Hollywood Gender Wars: The 57-year-old action specialist will become the first woman ever to take home a Miniature Gold Bald Man for a job that's as male-dominated as the U.S. military once was.
It's not a complete novelty to have been nominated. Lina Wertmüller (Seven Beauties) in 1976, Jane Campion (The Piano) in 1993, and Sofia Coppola (Lost in Translation) in 2003, managed it. And she's hardly a shoo-in, what with ex-hubby James Cameron (the 27-D, future-of-all-media, aggro-mythic Avatar) and Lee Daniels (left-field ridiculous phenom Precious), who could score a coup of his own as the first black (though hardly the first gay) man to win as best director. Anything could happen, and it probably will. But with its truckload of preliminary awards and eight additional Academy Award nominations (from best picture to sound editing), there's little doubt that The Hurt Locker had made its impact, and (no pun intended) blown up Bigelow's career at the very stage it might have begun a premature fade-out.
Perhaps as significantly, in zeitgest-y terms, this is the movie that finally makes a compelling and credible narrative feature of the nearly decade-long Iraqi War. The debacle has been a boon for documentarians, who rushed in where network news outfits feared to tread, telling stories the mainstream American media was too compromised to risk telling (No End in Sight, Taxi to the Dark Side, hell even Heavy Metal in Baghdad, among many notable efforts). Yet, attempts at fictionalizing such recent history for the screen have usually been hobbled by knee-jerk politics and tear-jerk dynamics.



